Good evening. Welcome to Tucker Carlson. Tonight. You’ve heard a lot over the past few days about the security of our electronic voting machines. And this is a real issue, no matter who raises it or who tries to dismiss it out of hand as a conspiracy theory, electronic voting is not as secure as traditional hand counting period.
It never will be as secure voters can see this because it’s obvious and it makes them nervous. And why wouldn’t it make them nervous? Our leaders have given us every reason not to trust technology. The people now telling us to stop asking questions about voting machines are the same ones who claimed that our phones weren’t listening to them.
They lie. We all know that other countries understand that they don’t use electronic voting because they know it. Confidence in democracy, a system cannot function if no one trusts the vote. And that’s true here too. As we’re finding out. Going forward. We need to find out exactly what happened in this month’s presidential election.
We need to find out no matter how long it takes the investigation to unfold or how much it costs. And once we get answers from that investigation, we ought to revert immediately to the traditional system of voting the one that served our democracy. For hundreds of years, what we’re doing now is not working.
That’s an understatement. As of tonight, the state of New York still hasn’t managed to count the votes in five house races. Thanks to mail-in voting. That’s a disaster. Let’s stop pretending that it’s not, but at the same time, we shouldn’t let our focus on voting machines distract us from all that happened earlier this month, the 2020 presidential election was not fair.
No honest person would claim that it was fair. On many levels. The system was rigged against one candidate and in favor of another, and it was rigged in ways that were not hidden from view. We all saw it happen. The media openly colluded with the democratic nominee. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris refused to explain what they would do if they were elected.
That’s never happened before in any presidential election, in American history, but the media allowed them to do it at the same time. Beginning in the spring, Democrats used our public health emergency for nakedly partisan ends. They punish Trump supporters for trying to gather, but they exempted their own activists, writers and vandals from BLM and Antifa from the COVID lockdowns entirely.
They said this out loud, the restrictions they did enforce crushed America’s small businesses, the heart of the Republican party. And yet they made their own donors, fantastically richer, Jeff. So alone saw his net worth jumped by more than $70 billion during the pandemic, then Democrats used the Corona virus to change their system of voting.
They vastly increased the number of mail-in ballots because they knew their candidates would benefit from less secure voting. And they were right. They use the courts to neutralize the Republican party, single most effective get out the vote operation, which for generations had been the national rifle association.
Not enough has been written about this, but anyone on the ground saw it. Thanks to legal harassment from the left, the NRA played a vastly reduced role in this election. And that made a huge difference in swing States like Pennsylvania and others, but above all. Democrats harnessed the power of big tech to win the selection, virtually all news and all information in the English speaking world travels through a single company, Google a huge percentage of our political debates take place on Facebook and Twitter.
If you use technology to sensor the ideas that people are allowed to express online, ultimately you control how the population votes and that’s exactly what they did. They rig the election in front of all of us. And nobody did anything about it. Dr. Robert Epstein saw this coming Epstein is one of the world’s foremost experts on the effect of big tech on politics.
Epstein is not a partisan Trump supporter. In fact, he’s a Democrat, but he believes in democracy. And for years, he has warned that Silicon Valley could steal this election. This is what he said when we spoke to him about a year ago. Uh, Google and similar companies like Facebook are completely unregulated in the United States so they can do whatever they please.
And if they all work together in 2020 to support the same presidential candidate, which is very likely, and probably it’ll be a candidate that I support, by the way, uh, they can shift upwards of 15 million votes. Uh, with no one, knowing that they’ve been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace, dr.
Epstein has tracked the effect he says Google has had on this month’s presidential election. And he joins us now to explain what he’s found. Doctor, thanks so much for coming on. What effect do you think, have you measured of big tech on the voting outcome this month? Well, a couple of things, uh, that we’ve looked at so far, first of all, we.
We had 733 field agents in three case swing States this year, uh, Arizona, North Carolina, and Florida. And we preserved more than 500,000 ephemeral experiences. Uh, that’s a lot, that’s about 30 times more data than we got in 2016. And we’re finding a couple of things that are pretty clear. Number one is that Google’s search results.
We’re strongly biased in favor of liberals and Democrats. This was not true on being our Yahoo. The bias was being shown to pretty much every demographic group we looked at, including conservatives. Uh, so in fact, conservatives got slightly more liberal bias in their search results than liberals did. How do you account for that?
And then we also found what seems to be a smoking gun that is we found a period of days when the vote reminder on Google’s home page was being sent only to liberals, not one of our conservative field agents received a vote reminder during those days. The good news is, uh, on that fourth day that we were monitoring, we went public with some of our findings and Google backed off.
They literally shut off that manipulation. That night. And so for four days before the election, they were showing vote reminders to everyone. Finally, what effect? And we’re thankful that you are apparently the only person monitoring this. It, it controls our Google single handily controls our view of the world.
And yet no one seems to care. But what do you imagine? The effects? What have you measured the effect of this manipulation had on the outcome of the election? Well, there are multiple manipulations here. We were also monitoring YouTube this time and Facebook and Bing and Yahoo. Uh, the bottom line at the moment is that these manipulations, the ones that we’ve so far quantified, uh, could easily have shifted at least 6 million.
Votes in just one direction. That’s the bare minimum at this point that I’m confident of the maximum. We haven’t even begun to, uh, to estimate that yet, because we have so much data to look at. So that’s the margin of the election right there. So you’re saying that what you feared could happen may indeed have happened that the manipulations from one company Google may have determined the outcome of the presidential election.
Well, we’ve been told this, uh, for nearly a year by whistleblowers from Google, we’ve seen it in leaked documents from Google leaked videos from Google. Uh, there’s no question that they said about after the 2016 election, uh, to make sure that president Trump, whom I do not support by the way to make sure they is not reelected.
And the massive amount of data we’ve collected is consistent with what the whistleblowers. And leaks have been telling us for a long time now. So yes, the answer is yes. So why is this not at the top of the concern of anybody who cares about democracy? Why are we allowing this to happen? But do you think, unfortunately, the answer is pretty obvious.
Um, uh, Google literally buys, um, candidates and politicians and. And my, my colleagues, my fellow academics are often, uh, bought by Google with large grants. So, uh, you know, the fact is that, uh, if you’re a Democrat or you’re a liberal, you like what Google, and to some extent, these other tech companies are doing you like it, it’s to your advantage.
You know, the problem though, is that we don’t know who Google is going to be supporting tomorrow. And in fact, in different countries around the world, They don’t necessarily support liberals. In some countries, they support conservatives in China. They’ve worked with the Chinese government to help surveil and control the Chinese population.
This is the story right here, dr. Epstein. I hope that you get the funding that you need to continue this research. I think it’s hard to think of many things more important, and I hope that changes are made immediately. Well, this is what we’ve moved to Georgia. So we’re now monitoring the Georgia runoff.
So we’re, we’re doing our best. I hope that you will. Thank you.